Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people 's reading and writing skills. Does the advantage outweigh the disadvantage?
In modern time, the young generation is called the computer generation sometimes. Some folks render that young people spend so much time communicating on electronic devices that their reading and writing skills are badly impacted. However, I think that there are both merits and demerits of the increasing usage of computers and cellphones to communicate.
Nowadays, young people usually spend a huge amount of time on the Internet, chatting or sending emails, etc. Communicating too much in the virtual world means less time spent on paper books and writing tasks on paper, weakening reading and writing abilities. Generally, they are presented information passively rather than 'hunt' for what they want to comprehend. This may exert negative influence on their accepting information. Most importantly, spelling mistakes can be corrected by word processors, which causes less attention on their mistakes even when it comes to writing on paper.
Nevertheless, there are advantages if the young can utilize the high convenience for communication in a good way. A great variety of well-written articles and electronic books are available in a simple click. Their reading and writing skills can be improved through these abundant resources. There are also some free online courses and well-designed websites for language learners. As typical example of them, lang-8 is a website where language learners all over the globe can correct essays for each other, as well as socialize.
Overall, to some extent, over-dependence on electronic devices to communicate does descend young ones 'capabilities of reading and writing. However, they can benefit from the convenience if making good use of it.
Machines have replaced physical work in many industries. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people think that robots are very important for humans 'future development. Others, however, think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, technology develops fast. In contemporary settings, the development of technology revolutionized people 's life in many aspects. There are various of robots. Someone some people think that robots are beneficial for humans' future development. Others think robots are a dangerous invention. I believe that each of views has its own merit. Considering the issue, it is crucial to explore it from two sides.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that inventions of robots generate favorable influence on consumers 'lives. Firstly, Scientists invent some robots in order to make people 's life more convenient. For example, the robot could sweep the floor and wash windows. It brings some convenience for family. could save consumers 'time and labor to the maximum extent, especially for people who are very busy in work. Robots can also play a significant role in factory due to their overwhelming advantages of efficiency and efficacy. Because there are some simple and repetitive operation could be replaced by robot to save employee 's labor. Boss doesn' t spend much money in employing those workers. At the same time, work efficiency can improve in a way.
However, other people think robots have more focus their attention on the disadvantages than advantages robots bring. It 's harmful for people who don' t receive good education. It means some easy job they could do before. Primarily, the intervention of robot in doing labor-intensive work could also rob job opportunities of some employees. When robots are qualified for the work, these people lacking professional skills might have difficulties to find finding another job. The probable result maybe they can 't live by themselves. The unemployment issue could pose threat to social stability. It will lead to some society problems. As we know, robots are invented by human, someone are worry about that if robots are designed complex or become smarter than people. They could have passive effects on society or cause safety concerns.
In conclusion, the invention of robots have both benefits and drawbacks, when people could make fully use of robots, the robot 's positive value is really shown to be maximized. At present, buying a robot is not cheap. With progress of society, robots might one day become common on society. However, measures should be taken to mitigate its negative influence.
In conclusion, robots would play more and more optimistic role in our life. We could look forward to lives which are surround by robots.
Some countries achieve international sporting success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Some countries today invest huge amount of money on specialized facilities for the training of their top athletes to achieve sporting success internationally. I think this investment is rewarding as long as it is not at the expenses of the sports facilities for the public.
The benefits of athletes winning on international sports arena such as Olympic Games or the World Cup Championship are multiple. For the athletes, who often come from economically underprivileged families, a champion can save them from their financial embarrassment, not just for themselves, but for the entire families as well. An Olympic champion, furthermore, can become a national hero and serve as the role model for numerous young people, who will try to be as hard-working, self-disciplined, and persistent as the champion. Most importantly, a hard-won champion title can even bring pride to the entire nation and help the nation to move on, especially in hard times.
However, more international champions should not become the excuse to cut down on the investment on the public sports facilities. A country without adequate sports facilities for the general public can never be truly encouraged no matter how many world champions it boasts. You will understand the frustration when you put on your sports shirt and go out, spurred by the perfect performance of an athlete you love in an important game, only to find that all available gyms and stadiums are crowded, leaving you nowhere to go.
To conclude, international sporting success is necessary, which explains why a country ought to put money into specialized facilities to train its top athletes. However, if the government has to make a choice between the world champions and the public sports facilities, I will support the second one. To my mind, only when the general mass of people enjoys the adequate sports facilities will they be encouraged and motivated by their world champions.